
Together cuts Qwen3.8 inference pricing, adds GLM-5.3 to serverless lineup
Together AI cut serverless inference pricing for Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B: input tokens fell from $2.50 to $2.00 per 1M (a 20% cut), output from $6.25 to $6.00 per 1M (4%), and cached input from $0.50 to $0.25 per 1M (50%).
Together’s pricing page · Change Detected
WHY IT MATTERS
As open-weight releases accelerate, neutral inference platforms face margin pressure from both directions — model labs shipping cheaper, better weights, and hyperscalers undercutting on raw compute. Watch whether cached-input pricing keeps compressing faster than input/output pricing across serverless inference providers generally — that would confirm agentic and long-context workloads, not raw token volume, are becoming the real pricing battleground.
BY THE NUMBERS
- Together also added GLM-5.3 to its serverless catalog, priced at $1.40 input / $4.40 output / $0.26 cached input per 1M tokens
- The sharpest number here is the 50% cut to cached-input pricing, not the smaller trims to input/output
THEIR RATIONALE
The move reads as a straightforward pass-through of falling model-serving costs plus a same-day catalog expansion: cut the price on an existing model while adding a new frontier open-weight model at a competitive rate, keeping Together's serverless lineup priced ahead of substitutes.
THE SIGNAL
The sharpest number here is the 50% cut to cached-input pricing, not the smaller trims to input/output. Cache pricing is the lever inference platforms use to compete for repeat-context workloads — agents, long chat histories, RAG — without touching headline rates that get quoted in comparisons. Pairing a price cut on an existing model with a same-day new-model launch also shows Together competing on portfolio breadth: keep customers inside the serverless catalog by constantly refreshing which model offers the best price per token, rather than defending any single model's price point.
WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING
Models matching Fable 5 capability at a fraction of the cost is genuinely shifting the economics. We actually dug into the performance:
View originalThe standard defense of premium models is that cheap ones need more attempts. Together AI ran 904 DeepSWE rollouts on GLM-5.3 and Claude Fable 5. Tied on the first try. Then the open model pulls ahead on every retry: 87.6% at four attempts against 84.1%, for $15.96 against $86.52. An open model with the higher ceiling, not just the lower price. Retries were supposed to be what you paid to avoid.
View original